Poem for peace

You’ll see that soon
in farce or fun
You’ll have this light
soon coming on

Just like the moon
the stars and sun
I tell you fight
NOW. It’s no con

We all know soon
folks have to run
under the moon
That is no fun

Better you NOW
while it’s still fun
know it is true
NOW just come on!

Advertisements

Ole Dammegård – Prayer of peace, joy, love and light that brings real change

On The Vinny Eastwood Show about the false flag in Christchurch, I hear Oles prayer for the first time. Ole is not religious and still he reads a prayer that moves me as an atheist, who was always very anti-religious. Here it is:

The prayer of Ole Dammegård in a very nice piece of art

This prayer Ole is reading, after many of his interviews, is a prayer made by his wonderful Raja-Yoga teacher Nalanie Harilela Chellaram. Here you have some of Nalanies affirmtions. This beautiful illustration has been created by Oles danish friend Thomas Koitzsch (homepage unknown).

Source: https://lightonconspiracies.com/about-ole/the-prayer/

Here the parayer by Ole himself at the end of this wonderful interview by Vinny:
https://lightonconspiracies.com/christchurch-exposed-ole-dammegard-on-the-vinny-eastwood-show/

I promise Ole and Vinny to change in this direction, step by step. I have been fooled myself. Most of us have. It is no big deal to admit it. Just try it!

More interesting:
The effect of a high speed bullet on a watermelon in MP4.
Pictures, video and analysis of the falsefalg in Christchurch. (in swedish)

It is NOT the “Stockholm syndrome”- It is lack of “enlightenment”

I have read the “How come the world is suffering from the Stockholm syndrome? It has been translated into Swedish on Global Politics and I might have some answers and additional evidence to the subject.

My post could maybe lead to some spiritual enlightenment? In my opinion it is NOT like the Stockholm syndrome at all, since it is not mainly a biological rational result of fear.

The behaviour is not a survival instinct at all, except possibly in fundamentalist islamistic countries, where not submitting to delusions of religious leaders, or dictators, can lead to death by stoning or similar, and where it must be considered more rational to obey blindly.

However, the sudden masshysteria of mass-smuggling of fundamentalist islamism into the west, calling all these people “children” and “refugees” could be in the intrest of the elite. A tool for them, in order to more easily control the world population in the future.

But no. This is quite another syndrome, in my opinion, and NOT limited to invaded or submissive countries, but well spread within the atheist and hypocrite christian West and the USA too. I call it the “lack of enlightenment” or that people in general are “mentally asleep” or have not yet reached some level of “awareness“.

First. Most individuals lack knowledge about how to expose lies and how to come closer to enlightenment. Why? Well, they almost never learn how to do it. The people do not know how “the controling words” work, and are scared into submission, like if they are dogs. The leaders use the peoples fear-sensitive brains, in order to make people less rational and create obediance.

The people also, most often, do not meditate in silence to deal with their non-rational fears, and consequently never reach a calm peaceful state, leading them to courage and true compassion, making it possible for people to think freely in many steps correctly, and consequently they are not aware in the moment, and consequently easy victims of lies.

The people do not know about all the fallacies always misleading them, like “ad populum” or “guilt by association”. They do not know how to spot the lies. Almost nobody exposes the lies in the media. The journalists instead use the lies repeatedly and perform black out on scientists wanting to expose the lies.

“The climite scientist are in consensus. There is a man-made global climate threat”

Really? Are they in consensus? What about all the scientist claiming something else? And when did “many believers” become a rational argument in scientific discourse? Where are the numbers and where are the opposing facts?

“Hitler claimed to be nationalist, so all who claim to be nationalists are like Hitler.”

Really? Hitler was also vegetarian. Are all vegetarians like Hitler too? By the way, wasn’t Hitler a globalist occupying territory, destroying nations and was he not against communism, just like … well …

The people does not know about tautologies, oxymorons or platitudes used by the elite to mislead them. Even Wikipedia hides the most important examples from the people and sometimes even promotes pejorative invented words, giving them a false meaning, that can be exposed when analyzing the actual component of the pejorative words and their content.

Just to give you an example of a blacked-out critique of an oxymoron! “Green growth”! Even a normally intelligent 12-year-old, who analyzes the green concept of “ecological sustainability” and then is taught the aritmetics of “exponential growth” of population, will come to the conclusion that the concept “Green growth” is an oxymoron.

albert_bartlett_80x80
”The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function.”
/ Albert Bartlett

Still when the Greens are being asked about it, with very reasonable questions, they refuse to answer, or try to put the questions down with the controlword “Ecofascism!“, or claim that parts of their policies are part of their “long tradition”, even if the consequenses, of not wanting to understand mathematical proof, destroys the very core of the movement, which is ecological sustainability.

Population Matters – The Earth cannot provide for us all and the natural world is paying the price!

No religion teaches how to expose the lies in order to be true. No people with power teaches it. Schools do not teach it. No economist teaches it. Instead they control their followers with their lies in short-term intrest. Theese false lying short-term leaders power is simply based on lies and naive people believing in them.

bertrand_russel_80x80
”One of the chief obstacles to intelligence is credulity, and credulity could be enormously diminished by instructions as to the prevalent forms of mendacity. Credulity is a greater evil in the present day than it ever was before, because, owing to the growth of education, it is much easier than it used to be to spread misinformation, and, owing to democracy, the spread of misinformation is more important than in former times to the holders of power.”
/ Bertrand Russell

Consequently people believe whatever they are being told repeatedly, coming from any leaders dominantly claming to be sitting on “the truth”, like reigious leaders, teachers, politicians or journalists.

The second thing is that thinking openly and questoning sceptically takes some effort, in the beginning, and most people are very lazy. They’ll rather be served any lies 24/7, than search actively for evidence or question the lies.

h_l_mencken_80x80
”The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself, without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos.”
/H. L. Mencken

The third thing is that even quite intelligent people do not realize that our brains, most often, are not wired logically like computers. Our brains, even if they have the knowledge to analyse and categorize, are not able to compute the extreme amount of lies mixed together with emotional argumentation, lacking real rational logic. The brain is more like a scale, leading the individual to believe in the amount of information, which is actually quite logical in nature for survival.

The fourth thing is the naive imagination by many people that leaders always want the best for their people, if only the leaders are using emotional arguments, or cuddle animals or babies in the media, or say things that people like to hear. Good people often have a hard time understanding that their chosen leaders, speaking with beautiful words, are the very psychopats robbing them of democracy and wealth.

bertrand_russel_80x80
”To acquire immunity to eloquence is of the utmost importance to the citizens of a democracy.”
/ Bertrand Russell

The victim is NOT “in love” with her or his tormentor, but simply fooled to believe in the american dream. And it is called “the american dream” because:

“You have to be asleep to believe it.”
/George Carlin

The good thing is, when knowing about the lies, how it works, this have the good potential to lead us all towards a more true world. In this process I find the following very important in our modern Internet times:

  1. Why you should try to get free hardware and free software:
    https://archive.org/details/RichardStallmanInterviewByJustinHall201403
    https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/wordpress-brings-the-freedom-to-the-front
  2. What is shadowbanning and could you be a victim of it:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadow_banning

Critique – Yanis Varoufakis – Stop the “ophobic” words and offer the people a Smörgåsbord of left-wing parties!

Yanis Varoufakis from Greece suggestsLet’s Change Europe From the Ground Up“, claiming that EU can be changed democratically and he uses derogatory controlling words against people who believe in exit from the monopolistic free trade. What could be more fitting than a quote from Mark Twain?

Picture of Mark Twain.
”In religion and politics, people’s beliefs and convictions are in almost every case gotten at second-hand, and without examination, from authorities who have not themselves examined the questions at issue, but have taken them at second-hand from other non-examiners, whose opinions about them were not worth a brass farthing.”
/ Mark Twain (In revised edition, chapter 78, p. 401, The Autobiography of Mark Twain, 1959, Charles Neider, Harper & Row.)

Varoufakis wants to propagagate DiEM25 in order to change the EU, but he fails to mention that EU is very difficult to change, because EU is NOT “democratic” in the true meaning of the word. People of Europe are NOT in control of “the wild beast”. Definition of “democracy” is based on majority vote by the people and for the people. Most Swedish people want to get out of the EU, but are denied the discussion and the vote, by the lying media and the lying politicians presented in it.

Picture of Paul Craig Roberts
”When a country’s government and media do nothing but lie 24/7, how can democracy exist? Clearly, it cannot.”
/Paul Craig Roberts (Source: OpEdNews 12/5/2017)

EU and its corruption is like a polish parlament from the 17th and 18th century. Varoufakis uses Lenins ideas as a secteristic sledge hammer, but Lenin had no idea of the media situation today, nor the ecological disaster that free trade and economical growth creates, bringing the whole world closer to the disaster of Easter’s End like an impossible hamster, not knowing when too stop growing.

albert_bartlett_80x80
”The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function.”
/ Albert Bartlett

Greedy monopoly capitalists and their lobbyists run freely in the corridors of EU, corrupting it for short term gain and destroying Europe and the world further. EU and its “free trade” is based on greedy economism, not scientific evidence. EU is not beeing ecologically sustainable development. EU also weakens the preparedness of every state and every people against invasions and different extinction events, favouring a “race to the bottom“, when the world should cooperate and help each other to become ecological sustainable and focus on different ways to avoid extinction instead!

When the fundament is flawed, it must be rebuilt correctly!

Anyone who is in favour of a flawed EU has lost the argument, no matter what fancy plans they might have for the EU, like DiEM25. Varoufakis own country, Greece, would have been much better off without the EU, corrupt or not. EU proved to be a disaster for the friendly people of Greece and for many more nation states. Varoufakis calls a willingness to exit EU “xenophobic”. It is a derogatory control word and is only a quarter true.

Xenophobia is usually defined as an opposition to foreign culture. FNL and ANC were clearly in opposition to foreign culture and considered to be left-wing nationalist. The democratic socialist Olof Palme supported them and that is why I am proud to call myself a left-wing nationalist today.

FNL and ANC did not want to be submissive, like Varoufakis, to an invading greedy foreign culture of oppression and they had the grand support of many left-wingers. The vietnamese were “xenophobic” according to definition, but was it wrong? On the contrary. It was just as patriotic as 99.9% of all soldiers in Venezuela supporting their people and their democratically elected president, Maduro.

I am sure Varoufakis and all his friends in the DiEM25 feel opposition to oppressive cultures invading countries in the world today, especially the shallow greediness culture. I bet DiEM25 have opposition to the serial massmurders “bringing freedom” or “proxy-terrorism” to countries, while perpetrating “collateral murder” on innocent children and non-combatants, whilst bringing its own puppets into power, in order to oppress people and steal the resources belonging to them.

At the same time I welcome ecologically sustainable travel and cultural exchange for completely rational reasons. I love the mix of Italian and Indian culture in the Swedish banana curry pizza. I love it myself and use ecological ingredients and mix in 50% full grain rye flower, like in the tasty Nordic/Swedish knäckebröd. What we like and dislike in a culture can be both rational and emotional, maybe depending on upbringing, maybe knowledge and individual hormones deciding our level of openess. In my opinion, the culture of cutting off parts of childrens genitals is an awful non-scientific child abuse, increasing risc of infection. In another culture it is maybe love for the child, based on very old african tradition with its own rationality.

Calling out “Xenophobia!” against people who dislike EU, after decades of EU-bullshit, is not very impressive to me. It is a form of lie and it is not an argument. It is not just rude. It is satanically mean. If any “ofobia”-word, is being used as a control-word, like “Oh you bad dog”, then the one who used it has clearly lost the argument. Big time. Are the people, who have emotions of xenophobia, like dogs? No. They are completely human, emotionally healthy and rational. They all deserve respect, peace, harmony and democracy.

Let’s ask ourselves: – What brings peace and happiness for the children?

Is it “xenophobic” or completely natural to dislike a dominant invader of a country, who does not respect its people or their culture? FNL pushed out the american war criminals back to the USA harshly, where we can assume that most of the drafted americans were much better off. The people of Vietnam created a long lasting peace. Was that “xenophobia” by the vietnamese, or just correct? Was “xenophobia” among the ANC freedom fighers against oppressive apartheid culture in Southafrica wrong? Why?

Dr Tara Swart, a neuroscientist and medical doctor, who studied the issue, claims on TEDxLSE that it is very natural to react negatively to the unknown, because it could be a threat, and that it is all about the evolution of the human brain, from tribal origins, through ethnic and geographic diversification, to the creation of the nation state, all the way up to modern nationalism.

The sociologist professor Ruud Koopmans is a scientist collecting data and giving his opinion about the evidence he found. Koopmans came to the conclusion that western society has never managed to integrate with fundamentalist islam. Furthermore Koopmans claims on Youtube that this fundamentalism is as high as 40-45% in Europe among muslims. Because of this fact Koopmans believe that multiculturalism with Islam is a bad idea. Should we dismiss him for having this opinion? Why?

Does Koopmans suffer from racism or xenophobia? Well, a sect is not a race, so his opinion is clearly not “racist”. Possibly he feels opposition to the culture of fundamentalist islam, but is it wrong to be critical to Sharia-laws and be in favour of western laws? Why? Should anyone be blamed for having emotions of opposition to a foreign culture seeking domination over ours, and be dismissed for beeing opposed to chaos? And why should we try to integrate people that clearly do not want to be integrated? How would that create peace? Clearly it would not.

Picture of Ayaan Hirsi Ali
“There is a huge difference between being tolerant and tolerating intolerance”
/Ayaan Hirsi Ali (Source: Wikiquote Ayaan Hirsi Ali)

Picture of Ayaan Hirsi Ali
”Islam is not a religion of peace. It’s a political theory of conquest that seeks domination by any means it can.”
/Ayaan Hirsi Ali (Source: Wikiquote Ayaan Hirsi Ali)

Picture of Bassam Al-Baghdady
“You can never extinguish fire by pouring more petrol on the fire and you will never solve religious extremism with even more religion.”
/ Bassam Al-Baghdady Source: https://www.svt.se/opinion/bassam-al-baghdady-om-malmo

Picture of Christopher Hitchens
”This is very urgent business, ladies and gentlemen, I beseech you: resist it while you still can and before the right to complain is taken away from you, which will be the next thing. You will be told, you can’t complain – because you’re Islamophobic. The term is already being introduced into the culture, as if it’s an accusation of race hatred for example or bigotry, whereas it’s only the objection to the preachings of a very extreme and absolutist religion.”
/Christopher Hitchens (Source: Rational Wiki Islamophobia)

When studying some of the quotes from different religions I think to myself “Imagine no religion”, like a true marxist, John Lennon and as probably many apostates from these religions do too. I believe the left should focus more on offering mental treatment and liberation for the religious from religion. I agree with Marx:

Picture of Karl Marx
”Religious suffering is, at one and the same time, the expression of real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people. The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is the demand for their real happiness. To call on them to give up their illusions about their condition is to call on them to give up a condition that requires illusions. The criticism of religion is, therefore, in embryo, the criticism of that vale of tears of which religion is the halo. Criticism has plucked the imaginary flowers on the chain not in order that man shall continue to bear that chain without fantasy or consolation, but so that he shall throw off the chain and pluck the living flower.”
/Karl Marx Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, Introduction…, p. 1 (1843).

At the same time, why not give these sects their freedom somwhere, including EU:s and USA:s economism-sect. Let them try eternal growth and their gods on some distant island, leading to war and destruction, starvation and cannibalism, natural disasters and deserts, if they really want it, but do let all who want scientific politics, using good proof and evidence from matamatics and science, be free from the sects! The leader of “Socialisterna” in Sweden once said to the people of the left-wing:

Picture of Johannes Regell
”Our pioneers were imprisoned because they mocked the priests and god and the left of today bow to priests who are at least as reactionary. Just that they come from another part of the world.”
/ Johannes Regell (Source: https://nyheteridag.se/plus/socialists-i-vastervik-om-vanstern-installation-till-boneutrop-man-sviker-sin-rorelseshistoria/)

If the left continues to use derogatory words, against the natural emotions people have and against science itself, instead of peacefully adapting to reality, then I am afraid there will soon be no balance at all, maybe even more oppression by the new right-wing elite, or in a few generations, with the logic of exponential growth, oppression by fundamentalist islam.

So. Comrades on the left! Do not use a bad counterpunch against anything! Use truth instead! Use the peaceful principles of verbal Judo! Be soft, take the real willpower of the people! Enforce it! Give the people what they really want! Thas is democracy. Let the people land softly and do embrace them softly! Give the emotional people a helping hand to be rational! Channel the peoples bitterness towards the source of the problem, the ones who evidently created the problem in the first place, but not against national emotions, since they are a symptom and a part of the people and these emotions are an important part of the natural solution: The left-wing nationalism!

Let’s not degrade the peoples natural emotions with controlling “ofobia”-words! Such arrogance will just push people, confronted with reality, to the other side of the political spectrum, to the warmongering side and the inequality side. The emotions of the people were created by the reality of non-peaceful monopoly capitalist policies often supported by psychopathic religious leaders. Most of the people just had completely natural human emotions because of the consequences and can become naturally more balanced quite easily. This can defuse the conflict and create balance and peace.

In my opinion, the correct way to unite all people peacefully, is to offer the people, a whole swedish Smörgåsbord of left-wing parties, parties that are eager too cooperate with each other, in order to create local and fair democracy in the communes, in the regions, in the nations, in the continents and in the world.

But we have to be clear about one thing! Intolerant fundamentalist dictatorial oppressive secterism, going against true democratic principals, can not be tolerated! This includes violent left-wing secterism, when we actually do have full democratic possibilities to peacefully reach out to the people, enlighten them and make them vote more balanced.

che_guevara_80x80
”Where a government has come into power through some form of popular vote, fraudulent or not, and maintains at least an appearance of constitutional legality, the guerrilla outbreak cannot be promoted, since the possibilities of peaceful struggle have not yet been exhausted.”
/ Che Guevara

Peace is good for the children. So let’s be peaceful where the people have democracy! Clearly there was never any good reason for the existance of any free trade including tax paradises, like EU or the USA, except as a very expensive lessons for our people. USA created inequality, sanctions and wars and EU created the same. A few benefitted economically, but not society as a whole, not even the rich, now being at risk of awful drugs and crime as well, and definetly not the countries being oppressed, used or invaded. Now we have proved it twice.

So. Let’s be compassionate for real and very clear! Let’s think about the children! Understand that free trade or imperialism is NOT in the best interest of any country or any people, not even for the rich. High murder frequence, in unequal countries, is evident in scientific meta-studies. No child deserves to live in such a society, no matter rich or poor. Free trade undermines both democracy and safety for us all. Unions also undermine ecologically sustainable development and creates social dumping.

So. Let’s accept that people have different cultures in different countries! Let’s accept different emotions with compassion! Let’s show people that we accept them and understand them! And let’s convince them all to vote for exit-parties, in favour of all our protected cultures and nation states, even if the people are not left-wing yet!

Best regards
Martin Gustavsson

Scientific party of Sweden (Vetenskapliga partiet)
For humanism, peace, preparedness, ecolocial sustainability and left-wing nationalism.

Rainbow coallition of Sweden (Valsamverkanspartiet)
All democratic parties in are wellcome to cooperate, in order to break undemocratic blockage levels. In Sweden 4%, in EU 5% for Sweden with 20 elected delegates.

Election manifesto for Vetenskaliga partiet
How to vote for Vetenskapliga partiet

Awsome news for world peace – The “bomb liberals” are shrinking in Sweden

The “bomb liberal” party of Sweden, called “Liberalerna”, is shrinking. They are not yet peaceful like for example the libertarian Lars Bern in Sweden, the libertarian Ron Paul, or the green Jill Stein, or the socialist Tulsi Gabbard, or like the socialist Michael Parenti in the USA. Not at all. So these “bomb liberals”shrinking is great news for both Sweden and the rest of the world.

Picture of the Swedish liberals logotype shrinking

Download a video about the Shrinking Swedish Liberals! I give it to you in MP4 or OGV, so you don’t have to run non-free spying malware on your computer, this thanks to Internet Archive and Richard Stallman, here explaining the problem of running non-free hardware and non-free software. ( also downloadable in MP4 and OGV) … just to be “liberal”, in the meaning free for real.

So let us celebrate this awesome happening, “bomb liberals” shrinking, making us all smile, a peaceful happening that can soon lead to world peace, especially IF more of us are all motivated to share more such great news between us! More and more of us are all going in the right direction now, I believe. This is awesome!

Good job everybody working a for peace every day, if only a tiny bit. Thankfulness to all of you from the bottom of my heart. Special thanks goes to Samnytt i Sweden giving me this great news. Samnytt promote at least one peaceful party, and also allow comments from the people and other parties on their news site. They have also stopped promoting ethnic cleansing of palestinians in Israel, wich is also wonderful, in my opinion.

Let all diffrent people live in peace and harmony, separated if neccesary and in freedom from each other if neccesary!

Satirical pigs – List of why you might love MSM manure & alternative media manure

Have you ever wondered why you are so drawn to dominant mainstream media manure, coming from the monopolized mainstream media? I have analyzed it a bit and might have some answers. It comes with some positive advice on what to focus on, in order to become free from the manure.

The creators of the MSM manure all seem to agree on feeding us manure.  The MSM manure is owned by, and controlled by, a few media moguls, who meet openly, but talk in secrecy at the Bilderberg Group, together with big corporations, leaders of banks and a whole bunch of leading monopoly-marketliberal politicians. This is NOT a conspiracy theory. No satire! It is very real and very undemocratic indeed.

Or let me put it in more positive words; – Why do we not seek the truth through humble scientific method, meditation and a more correct reasoning through channels that at least give us the impression of honesty and desency?

But lets be fair to this “Bilderberg Group manure”! It is not alone spreading manure. There is also alternative media manure, for example Youtube clickbaits or clickbait blog titles, and bloggers who are just as equally dominant and full of manure, lacking sources for claims, and they do make all kinds of claims. Some of these claims are not exactly pulled out of a Straberry tart, to put it mildly.

So let me put it in positive words; – Why do we not read a better alternative media, backing up claims with more reasonable sources or real analysis or investigation?

Or have you ever wondered why we cannot withstand different kinds of fallacies, or political oxymorons like “sustainable growth“, and instead be motivated to look up better people who are using proper facts and proper reasoning, in a more scientific way, people who do use scientific sources for their claims?

Picture of pigs eating manure coming from a TV. Text suggesting reasons. Mommy and daddy did it? New masters does it too? Creating emotions & is irresistible? Easy access & Steady flow? Avoiding own thought? Easy to swallow? Easy to puke on others? Satisfies curiosity comfortably? Fake sense of social life? Distracting from suffering? Perverted sadomasochism?
I believe we should all ask ourselves these question, and meditate on the possible answers. At least, it really makes me wonder when sometimes I catch myself eating the manure, laughing at myself, feeling like a little happy pig eating manure.

Picture of happy laughing pig
This happy pig illustrates my own feeling
in the moment of enlightenment.

In that moment I often find it interesting to think about it, and laugh to myself, and I also feel very motivated to ponder on what we all should do about it. What is the solution?

I mean, it might be VERY IMPORTANT to consider these questions, because it looks like quite some bunch of MSM manure propagandists are creating conflict, between men and women, races, sects, and some of them even shamelessly make propaganda for war, with words like X “has to go”, or using the word “missions” instead av “war crimes” or calling individuals “very bad people” or “Putinists” without any evidence, or not letting the defamed people answer to these claims.

Picture of a pig with hat and sunglasses
What kind of a dirty pig
does such a thing?

For me it is more reasonable to believe that we all, and coming generations, no matter local culture, benefit more from calmness, compassion, evident truth, (sometimes separation of cultures if they cause conflict) and peace.

I believe that we, with peace, much better can put focus on great things, leading us to balance with nature, like balanced population, or why not prepair better for those events science are warning humanity about, like extreme weather, supervolcanoes or near Earth objects, maybe even focus our energy on creating colonies in space, possibly being able to save many species and humanity from such extreme events?

Our motivation to find the evident truth about things might differ in each case, but if we say that we want the evident truth, and really mean it, then we should also be more motivated to focus on finding evident truth with more grit!

Are you motiveted to find more evident truth in your life? – Then I suggest:

+ Do meditation/introspection in silence in solitude!

+ Do investigate all kinds of fallacy and practice to categorize it, and inform others, when ever you discover it!

+ Do study scientific theory, rethoric, philosophy and leadership psychology!

+ Do abandon media if:

  • it’s poor in using reliable sources for claims.
  • it’s using clickbaits, not connecting title with content.
  • it’s not allowing you to contradict claims in a comment field.
  • it forces you to run non open, non free, hardware and scripts/apps/programs. Stallman explains why. (FSF, Icecat, Firefox and NoScript helps you to discover it. WordPress-blogs can be read openly and freely.)

+ Find media that is:

  • using reliable sources for claims. (News agencies ar not reliable)
  • using relevant titles connecting well with the text.
  • allowing you to contradict in a comment field.
  • working well without spying malware scripts.

So. What do you think about my suggestions of plausible reasons in the satirical pig picture, and the advice? Do you have other suggestions?

(I do not know the origin of the first satirical  pig picture. It was in my mailbox. I put some color on it and I added the text. So if you do know the origin or have some other ideas about why you watch mainstream media manure, or constantly end up amazed by crazy clickbaits on Youtube, then please do tell me your own hypothesis of your own behaviour, because I would love to listen to your thoughts and feelings, and would also love linking to the creator of the original picture!)

(This was my first post asking people in Sweden about this.)

The point of using words correctly – The Media, that is owned or controlled by the monopoly guys, is NOT “left-wing”

In order to bring peace compassion and understanding we must use words correctly. Then words will be true, will have the same meaning for everyone, and communication will start to function properly between us. This has potential to bring peace, compassion and understanding, which is the basics for real democracy. We must also call each other things that we can agree that we actually are.

So today I must correct something I feel is untrue, since I believe the man behind it actually might have honest intentions, wants to speak the truth, and obviously exposes many things he believe is untrue in his text, things that are very very reasonable for everyone to consider.

Is it true or not? – Be honest to yourselves! – TRUTH DOES NOT HURT. Only resistance hurts.

Ask yourselves: – Is the media, that is owned by the monopoly capitalists, really “left-wing“? – I think not. The whole political spectrum has moved far to the right, in most countries in the world, because of the illusion from this media, in what we might call a global tax-“race to the bottom“.

That the Democratic Natonal Congress was corrupted, and that this corruption was connected to the monopoly capitalists, who also owns much of the media, who deliberately created a black-out against the real left-winger Bernie Sanders, is evident. This behavior from this media should maybe not be called “left-wing” in any reasonable way, but simply corruption? I mean, since it is not in the real left-wing-peoples interest at all, but actually cost the Democrats the presidency.

The problem is similar in Europe. The alt-right falsely claims that everything strange in politic is “left-wing”. They sometimes even call republicans or extreme market-liberals, who are corrupted by monopoly capitalists, for “left-wing”, as if there is no alternative left, as if there is no national democratic leftist, as if there is no left that is more trustworthy, as if there is no alt-left seeing things more clearly, as if there is no more honest “left-wing”.

Well, surprise! A more honest national alt-left exists. It is there and does not deserve to be compared to the Clintons or to the lying media companies, owned by the monopoly guys. Do find the alt-left, and do ask them your questions and give them some attention! The monopoly capitalists won’t. They fear them more than anything else, and they black them out, even if they shouldn’t.

We should all have a big party together, bring out the guitar and share all natural and sustainable things, that we all can bring to the party, and talk about different ways to save us all. We could talk about saving us all from the real evident threats science agree to 100% about, such as supervolcanoes, or large asteroids, or nuclear war heads, or overpopulation, not invented threats, created by the monopoly guys, in order to reach global/imperialist power!

Take care of yourselves and everyone else, long-term!

Martin Gustavsson
Member of the Scientific party of Sweden