After reading two posts, obviously seeking to crush the peace candicate Tulsi Gabbard, with all kinds of fallacies (lies) and manipulative NLP (neuro liguistic programming), I want to expose these very young writers and their legal crime against peace. Still say Aloha to them! Here they are:
I can only feel sorry for Branko and Kerry, these two young writers, because they probably think they are aware of what they are doing, not realizing the legal crime they are committing against world peace, but I believe they might have been brainwashed by a very devilish psychopathic sect, thereby following other psychopaths.
I believe it is very unlikely that this will benefit themselves, their friends, families or their sects/groups at all. Therefore they must be forgiven, and we must all hope that they will heal mentally. if you are their friend, then do help them!
First. Why forgiveness for Branko and Kerry?
Well. Incompetence is of course very difficult to comprehend, due to the Dunning-Kruger-effect, so I hope Branko and Kerry soon will feel an urge to seek truth and do meditation, in order to see the evident truth more clearly, just like peace candidate Tulsi Gabbard obviously does. I can feel that she does.
I do meditation too, just like the peaceful Buddha did and like the peace prince Jesus did, and through such meditation we can peel off some layers of our false persona and become more true. Such meditation might not only change Branko’s and Kerry’s views of Tulsi Gabbard, but of course also improve their work as writers in general.
Second. Why should Branko and Kerry put peace first?
Knowing about previous mass-murders by Adolf Hitler, current day illegal invasions and mass-murders by the USA, Saudi Arabia, terrorism by extreme islamic sects in Syria and illegal invasion and ethnic cleansing by the nazi-sionist Israel, and that The Doomsday Clock now is closer than ever to midnight, we should all be very careful when choosing our leaders, everywhere!
Third. Why should Branko and Kerry separate lies from truth?
The human brain is not a computer. We tend to believe what is being repeated most, that is why Branko and Kerry should not repeat lies, that they know are lies, since they could begin believing in them. So in order to be more true, Branko and Kerry should know about all kinds of lies that psychopaths use against peaceful people like Tulsi Gabbard, and be open for correction!
I have written more about these lies in Swedish, but in short and relevant for Branko’s and Kerry’s texts:
IQ is NOT the same thing as intelligence. Branko and Kerry seem to have high IQ, most leaders do, and so did Hitler. Still he destroyed Europe and especially Germany. So planning to kill all citizens of the USA in a mad nuclear war does not seem to be very intelligent, does it? Still, some leaders in the USA are actually planning nuclear war today. No joke! They are chosen by the citizen of the USA because they are letting themselves be brainwashed by people just like Branko and Kerry, so that people will not vote for peaceful candidates like Tulsi Gabbard, Bernie Sanders or Jill Stein etc.
To be naive is a form of lie, since we know the existence of manipulation by psychopaths. Basically “Don’t be a Zucker!”, as Richard Stallman often say. Branko and Kerry, for example, could believe blindly in lies repeated by psychopathic media about Bashar Al-Assad and blindly believe that the “axis of goodness” actually are “good” when they are the ones clearly committing war crimes, while evidence of Assad’s crimes does not exist. Naive is also believing that the harsh form of islam, worshiped by terrorists, is a “religion of peace”.
Oxymorons like “freedom of religion” when most religions remove freedoms, even threatens apostates with death are of course straight out lies when this is the result:
”People ask me if I have some kind of death wish, to keep saying the things I do. The answer is no: I would like to keep living. However, some things must be said, and there are times when silence becomes an accomplice to injustice.”
/Ayaan Hirsi Ali (Source: Wikiquote Ayaan Hirsi Ali)
Freedom in constant fear. Is that freedom? We cannot accuse Ali of “islamophobia”, when courageously speaking out against islam, now can we? Not really “phobia” at all, is it? It is courage.
Distractions are lies, because they take discussions and thoughts away from important topics, by for example focus on the childhood of Tulsi Gabbard, like Kerry does, instead of Tulsi Gabbard’s political positions in important issues, like world peace or ecological sustainability or preparedness or equality.
Branko and Kerry could of course be like two of Skinners rats. Then they have to get out of their created boxes in order to become free and true! Now. For the person locked in the box, a more free person like Tulsi Gabbard, might seem to be a bit strange or crazy, when she can not be put in this or that kind of box, but what if it is insanity to live in a red or a blue box, and adopt all kinds of behavior and opinions, only because of box-stimuli, instead of deep independent investigation and meditation? And talking about crazy, by the way, is not today’s media’s newspeak naming “war-crime” “peace keeping” crazy?
To be able to create conflict in a society the elite has to force people into boxes. Does Branko and Kerry consider themselves to be elite or are they just rats in a box? Who knows? Still the behavior is not peaceful, like Tulsi Gabbard is, when reaching out to different world leaders and and speaking peaceful words of wisdom.
A fallacy is the use of invalid or faulty reasoning. Branko’s and Kerry’s texts are completely full of fallacies. Such fallacies are often committed intentionally to manipulate or persuade the people by deception, while others are committed unintentionally due to carelessness or ignorance. What is the case here? Who knows?
False appeal to emotion. What we all should strive for is rationality combined med emotional correctness, for example not destroy other peoples countries, not support terrorists, just like Tulsi Gabbard suggests, and not starving trade-dependent states with sanctions, but being peaceful, just like Tulsi Gabbard.
Groupthink is a phenomenon that occurs within a group/sect, in which the desire to agree results in an irrational or dysfunctional outcome. I do not know if Branko and Kerry are part of such a group/sect, or just victim of a media-induced mass psychogenic illness. Both phenomenon could of course explain their behavior towards the peaceful Tulsi Gabbard.
Can there be change? – Yes there can be change! – Has there not always been?